Facebook Lite could be an automaton app designed for low speed connections and low verbal description phones. it’s been on the market outside the US for a couple of years, and currently it’s available within the US, too. Here are the variations between it and therefore the original Facebook app.
Facebook’s main app weighs in at fifty seven MB on my Motorola Moto E4; Facebook fat-free is a mere 1.59 MB—that’s concerning 96.5% less space. Facebook fat-free is meant to use less RAM and hardware power, as well, thus you’ll get a electric sander expertise on a less expensive and less powerful phones. Facebook Lite even works on older phones that are not any longer supported by the regular app. If you wish to ascertain it out, you’ll be able to grab Facebook fat-free from the Play store.
RELATED: Are low cost automaton Phones value It?
additionally as victimisation fewer system resources, Facebook fat-free is de facto designed to figure on slow or unstable web connections like 2G networks or in rural areas with a nasty signal. to try to to this, it uses a great deal less information by not downloading high resolution pictures or autoplaying videos. This has the additional bonus of saving you cash if you’re on a metered plan.
Surprisingly, Facebook fat-free is nearly as absolutely featured because the regular Facebook app. you’ll be able to still like and investigate your friend’s posts, visit their profiles, post to your own Timeline, and do everything else you commonly do.
Even with all the options present, the distinction you’ll notice with Facebook fat-free is that the completely stripped down interface with bigger, blockier howevertons and different parts. It feels pretty dated, but it’s functional. On phones with smaller screens, the larger UI elements are positively a plus, although on my Moto E4 they just feel funny oversized. within the screenshots here, Facebook fat-free is on the left and therefore the regular app is on the right.
Must you Use Facebook or Facebook fat-free?
Facebook Lite features a heap going for it. It’s got all Facebook’s banner features, uses fewer system resources and fewer data, and works on slower connections. the sole draw back is that it feels quite basic. The stripped down interface, massive sq. buttons, and loading bar (yes, there’s a loading bar) want one thing from the late 2000s. It doesn’t look all that completely different to however I bear in mind Facebook showing on my Nokia.
If you’ve got an honest automaton phone and an honest mobile information plan, I’d recommend jutting with the regular Facebook app. On the opposite hand, if you’re running an older phone or need to avoid wasting mobile data, there’s no damage in giving it a look. It’s solely 2MB, and therefore the worst case situation is you turn back. it’d even be precisely the Facebook app you’re trying for.
The name is an evident giveaway: Facebook fat-free is just about a lighter version of the complete Facebook app. This different Facebook app features a specific user and market in mind, and it comes with its own advantages, additionally as its own set of cons. We’ll cowl the main points of Facebook vs Facebook fat-free nowadays and assist you select whether or not the fat-free app is for you, or if you ought to stick with the quality Facebook application.
Related: the simplest alternative Facebook apps for automaton
what’s Facebook Lite?
The Facebook app is supposed to supply the complete social network experience, with all its enhancements, features, and tools, while not compromises. As such, it are often a awfully power and resource-hungry app, that is great for individuals while not power, smartphone storage, or cellular information limitations, who need to induce the complete Facebook experience. However, this app may be an excessive amount of for people who don’t have access to such luxuries.
Facebook fat-free was created with additional casual users, house owners of cheap phone, and developing markets in mind. It’s a way less strict application that strips Facebook all the way down to its core functionality. place simply, Facebook fat-free could be a barebones version of the full Facebook app.
you will be speculative whether you’d be comfortable victimisation Facebook vs Facebook fat-free. Let’s re-examine a number of the most differences.
Why Facebook fat-free is best
Let’s begin with the explanations that build Facebook fat-free a lot of better|a higher|a stronger|a more robust|an improved} different to the proper user.
Facebook Lite could be a much smaller app
a number of you’ll} have phones with little space for storing to spare. this can be often the case with cheap handsets. this can be particularly a problem, considering the Facebook app is by no means that atiny low one.
the precise file size will vary by phone, however we’ve done a clean transfer employing a element 4a with 5G, and it weighs 162MB. Meanwhile, Facebook fat-free is just 2.51MB on a similar handset. As you’ll be able to see, the distinction is massive.
If you regularly end up running out of storage space, you may need to think about jutting with Facebook Lite.
The regular Facebook app forces you to download Facebook courier to speak along with your contacts. this can be not the case with Facebook Lite, that permits you to chat straight from the same application. simply faucet on the courier tab and sort away.
You won’t have to be compelled to transfer a secondary application for your electronic communication needs, saving additional precious storage space. you’ll be able to download Facebook courier fat-free if you prefer, however it’s not obligatory.
Facebook fat-free uses less web information
Cellular data are a few things several people town dwellers and developed nations voters don’t typically have to worry about. we’ve 4G and 5G information measure to spare, but cellular data is way more restricted in different areas. If your set up has you capped, if you reside in a very 2G/3G area, or have unhealthy reception, you’ve got to observe your data consumption. this can be one issue that produces the selection between Facebook vs Facebook fat-free obvious.
Facebook fat-free is formed to figure well even at 2G speeds. It will a couple of things to form positive this is possible. For starters, pictures aren’t pre-loaded, so that they are downloaded and displayed as you scroll down. this can be sensible for saving your precious megabytes, however it additionally makes the expertise a touch slower. Videos won’t play mechanically on Facebook Lite, unless you’re connected to Wi-Fi.
Also: the simplest information saver apps for automaton
If you’re not pleased with all that information saving, you’ll be able to build some modifications within the settings, together with reducing picture quality, lowering video quality, or perhaps turning information Saver on. All of those choices can assist you to stay data usage to a minimum. to not mention downloading the app itself would require considerably less data.
you’ll be able to positively tell the distinction in quality, however the benefits may be well value that sacrifice. Facebook fat-free are a lot of quicker and easier on your web usage.
Facebook fat-free features a cleaner look
We’ve mentioned that one amongst the foremost important variations between Facebook and Facebook fat-free is that it’s much simpler, and this can be additionally evident within the general look of the app. The UI is way cleaner, and a few of you may like it over the regular Facebook app’s aesthetics.
Icons keep a more simplified design, and there are much less random choices going in the way. Post comments seldom show informed your News Feed, that helps keep a decluttered interface. Notifications also appear rather more simplified, and more can truly slot in one screen, negating the requirement to scroll as much.
Why you may need to stay with Facebook
Those making an attempt to work out the Facebook vs Facebook fat-free perplexity might find yourself realizing the sacrifices aren’t enough to switch. Let’s re-examine a number of the explanations why the initial Facebook app might be {a better|a far better|a much better|a higher|a stronger|a additional robust|an improved} option.
picture and video quality
pictures and videos look better within the regular Facebook app, unless you tinker with the settings. This isn’t unhealthy for several of you, however having better image quality is unquestionably nice.
will Facebook have more features?
We’ll be honest and say we tend to can’t notice essential options missing from Facebook Lite. we’ve the news feed, Marketplace, stories, videos, reels, the chums section, and Messenger. you’ll be able to even play games, manage events, examine the geological dating section, and manage ads, among different things. Facebook swears thusme features are missing on Facebook Lite, though. Having additional is usually higher than having less, so we’ll say Facebook could be a better bet during this department, notwithstanding we can’t find a lot of we can’t do on Facebook Lite.
Next: Is Facebook not operating for you? Here’s a way to fix it
the sole amendment we predict may be necessary is that the lack of a sharing choice on Facebook fat-free. What’s additionally true is that everything is fewer faucets away on the complete Facebook app. Comments show additional often, and more looks to be done mechanically within the background. The menu section also looks more dynamic and interactive, packed with shortcuts and suggestions.
availableness
This won’t be a tangle to our fellow automaton users, as Facebook Lite is wide on the market on the Google Play Store, however one draw back may need you go together with Facebook, rather than Facebook fat-free. The app isn’t on the market all over for iOS users. For example, we tend to can’t get Facebook Lite for iOS within the USA. this suggests several of you can’t get Facebook Lite, notwithstanding you needed to.
Facebook vs Facebook Lite: the decision
the complete Facebook app can provide a additional complete expertise if you’ve got no storage, data, performance, or power limitations. It comes with the full Facebook experience, while not compromises. It’s additionally possible the manner Facebook desires you to experience their platform.
thereupon said, it’s also true that we tend to didn’t miss a lot of throughout our tests with Facebook Lite. Sure, pictures associated videos didn’t look as great, however they additionally weren’t extremely bad. the dearth of pre-loading created things a bit slower, but that also means that saving information for what matters, and therefore the wait was typically a second or two. You’ll notice it, but it won’t steal your day away. Some might even just like the UI a touch better.
If you’re having problems with data speeds, or have an older phone with little storage, we are saying you’ll just do fine with Facebook Lite. it’d even be a convenient different for people who don’t essentially got to ration, however need to stay their Facebook expertise low-key. Some may even get pleasure from having Facebook and courier in one app.
